Integrasi ESG dalam Manajemen Anggaran Sektor Publik: Sintesis Awal Atas Green Budgeting dan Participatory Budgeting pada Pemerintah Daerah di Indonesia
Integrating ESG into Public Sector Budget Management: A Preliminary Synthesis of Green Budgeting and Participatory Budgeting in Local Governments in Indonesia
Keywords:
ESG, green budgeting, participatory budgetingAbstract
The environmental, social, and governance (ESG) framework is expanding rapidly within the corporate finance sector; however, its application to public sector budget management remains fragmented. This paper provides an initial synthesis of literature on green budgeting and participatory budgeting—including gender-responsive budgeting and sustainable public procurement—that relates to the three dimensions of ESG. Based on a phased literature search and direct verification of seventeen primary studies and four comparative literature reviews—covering contexts in Indonesia, Ghana, Italy, Mexico, Uruguay, Colombia, Australia, Germany, South Korea, France, Austria, the Netherlands, Sweden, and Brazil, as well as the African and Latin American regions, nine European nations, and a panel of 107 countries—this synthesis finds that the literature for each dimension has developed independently, lacking a unifying analytical framework. The environmental dimension is typically examined through cross-country quantitative studies; the social dimension frequently employs qualitative and policy-narrative approaches (notably in the Indonesian context); and the governance dimension continues to face challenges regarding inconsistent measurement across studies. Two cross-cutting findings warrant emphasis. First, "green" or "participatory" labeling does not automatically yield substantive impact; this is evidenced by the negative moderating effect of "green budget tagging" in Ghana and the distributive inequities associated with municipal green bonds in Africa, Latin America, and the United States. Second, the quality of citizen engagement is a more significant determinant of fiscal and social outcomes than the mere existence of participatory mechanisms—a pattern consistently observed in studies from South Korea, Solo (Indonesia), and Paris. This synthesis concludes that the integration of ESG into public sector budget management remains an open research agenda. It further suggests that future research should incorporate a comprehensive, systematic literature search following PRISMA protocols before any claims regarding novelty or the full scope of the existing literature can be definitively substantiated.
Downloads
References
Awudu, S., Nugraha, Furqon, C., Sari, M., & Yuliawati, A. K. (2025). The moderating role of green budget tagging on budgeting practices and fiscal policy sustainability in Ghana's local government. Khazanah Sosial, 7(2), 524-538.
Bartocci, L., Grossi, G., Mauro, S. G., & Ebdon, C. (2023). The journey of participatory budgeting: A systematic literature review and future research directions. International Review of Administrative Sciences.
Bryngemark, E., Söderholm, P., & Thörn, M. (2023). The adoption of green public procurement practices: Analytical challenges and empirical illustration on Swedish municipalities. Ecological Economics, 204, Part A.
Capelle-Blancard, G., Crifo, P., Diaye, M-A., Oueghlissi, R., & Scholtens, B. (2017). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance and sovereign bond spreads: An empirical analysis of OECD countries.
Coghill, K., Buchholz, G., & Waheduzzaman, W. (2026). Innovating fiscal transparency through open government partnerships: A comparative study of local governments in Australia and Germany. Administrative Sciences, 16(2), 106.
Côme, T., Magne, S., & Steyer, A. (2023). Participatory budgeting: Behind the words, the euros. Empirical study of 4043 projects in Paris (2014-2021). Dalam Participatory and Digital Democracy at the Local Level, Contributions to Political Science.
Fithriyah. (2017). Indonesia's experience: Implementing gender responsive planning and budgeting. Jurnal Perencanaan Pembangunan: The Indonesian Journal of Development Planning.
Grandia, J., & Voncken, D. (2019). Sustainable public procurement: The impact of ability, motivation, and opportunity on the implementation of different types of sustainable public procurement. Sustainability, 11(19), 5215.
Grillos, T. (2017). Participatory budgeting and the poor: Tracing bias in a multi-staged process in Solo, Indonesia. World Development, 96, April 2017.
Guariso, D., Guerrero, O. A., & Castañeda, G. (2023). Automatic SDG budget tagging: Building public financial management capacity through natural language processing. Data & Policy, 5, e31.
Herrera, H. (2024). The proliferation of municipal green bonds in Africa and Latin America: The need for a climate justice approach. Environment & Urbanization, 36(1).
Li, Y., Meydan, A. G., Wei, C., & Zhao, G. (2025). How does green budget revenue policy promote economic sustainable development? Empirical evidence from 107 global economies. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 13.
Markovič Hribernik, T., Bratić, V., & Prijaković, S. (2025). Economic and political determinants of local government budget credibility: A review of empirical evidence. Lex localis - Journal of Local Self-Government.
Mol, A., van Schie, V., & Budding, T. (2025). Drivers of sustainability reporting by local governments over time: A structured literature review. Financial Accountability & Management.
Navarro-Galera, A., Alcaraz-Quiles, F. J., & Ortiz-Rodriguez, D. (2018). Enhancing sustainability transparency in local governments: An empirical research in Europe. Sustainability, 10(7), 2161.
Oppi, C., Cavicchi, C., & Vagnoni, E. (2021). The journey to gender-responsive budgeting: Lessons learned from higher education. Sustainability, 13(4), 2019.
Park, J., Butler, J. S., & Petrovsky, N. (2023). Understanding public participation as a mechanism affecting government fiscal outcomes: Theory and evidence from participatory budgeting. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 33(2).
Polzer, T., & Seiwald, J. (2021). Gender-responsive budgeting in Austria: The narrow line between implementation and confirmation. Public Money & Management, 41(7), 527-538.
Polzer, T., Nolte, I. M., & Seiwald, J. (2023). Gender budgeting in public financial management: A literature review and research agenda. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 89(2).
Santos, B. de S. (1998). Participatory budgeting in Porto Alegre: Toward a redistributive democracy. Politics & Society, 26(4), 461-510. Catatan: abstrak belum terverifikasi, dikutip sebagai rujukan konteks sejarah.
Soli, T., Mutia, A., & Tanjung, F. S. (2026). Analysis of transparency, accountability and community participation in village fund financial management. Journal of Accounting Inquiry.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nurlina Nurlina, Andi Faisal (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


